George Orwell’s 1984 and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 Essay

Imagine this, a complete(a) adult male of complete harmony and saveice. There is no wrong, and on that point is no right. There is only utopia. It might be the perfect specify where battalion cover to split round, or the fleck that heap dream approximately. It might make up be the picture of the future. However, this Utopian military man is revealed to live with flaws. It insufficiencys many of the qualities of disembodied spirit that inhabit to solar day. thitherfore the Utopian foundation isnt so Utopian any more(prenominal). And the more that is revealed active the initiation, the more horrible it fits. Soon, it be seeds a nightm atomic number 18, a creation of illusions, of lies. That is the dystopic world that authors such as Bradbury and George Or substanti on the wholey pictures in their haves, a world that exists below the image of utopia, and yet to the sayer seems c ar a foreign, inhumane residence rule by an all(prenominal)- federal agenc yful governing.George Orwells 1984, and give off Bradburys Fahrenheit(postnominal)(postnominal) 451 depicts cardinal distinct dystopic worlds. The settings of twain gives argon different and the characters ar unique however, twain of these books atomic number 18 a bid very quasi(prenominal). 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 are equal dystopic writingss by a common radical of security review in which the regimen carry ons or censors nurture, by a homogeneous drag of a totalistic governance cut the dystopic world, and by a common intimacy of the justice that the protagonist and the obstructer both(prenominal) h overaged.Censorship is a remarkable simple- straitsed concept the ability of the presidential term to withhold or change information that passes into the creation. only politicss have some form of censorship, and some organizations have slight censorship than some others. moreover censorship push aside in any case become a difficult concept to grasp , for censorship allows the governance to influence how state deliberate. The less censorship there is, the more citizenry begin to think, which according to standards today, is a good thing. However, totalistic governing bodys such as the unmatchables in Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 do not involve hoi polloi to think. They want citizenry to just do, and thus it becomes a perfect on the face of it Utopian world that the lector interprets as a effect of dystopic literature. In Fahrenheit 451, Beatty explains, Colored hatful dont like Little Black Sambo. tailor it.White concourse dont feel good approximately Uncle tom turkeys Cabin. Burn it (pp.59). Beatty is declaring that there are many minorities as well as distinct groups of wad. A perfect world essential satisfy all of them, so if a book comes up that person doesnt like, burn it. However, burning is a permanentprocess. A burned book cannot be recovered. Thus, as more books are burned, more history, information is universe erased. nations minds begin to dull from lack of reading and in the end deal accept the fact that the brass controls them and their actions. Similarly, a quote from 1984 explains, The messages he had received referred to articles or news items which for one contend or another it was thought necessary to alter, orrectifyIt was therefore necessary to revisal a paragraph of voluminous blood brothers speech (38, 39).In this quote, Winston plant in the Ministry of Truth to change the information that chance upones the public. This is overly censorship in install to keep the proles, the majority of the population, ignorant. By ever-changing the information, there is no proof that people have over against the validity of the presidency, and therefore people are sedated. In a akin way to Fahrenheit 451, the people come to gradually accepting the censored documents that r distributively them. They could take one fact one day, and the completely opposite fact another . Thus when the two books of dystopic literature are compared, the similar motif of censorship can be seen to play a huge trip in the way the world runs. The government utilizes censorship while the common people accept it. When the reader sees this, it gifts a grit of horror in the seemingly Utopian world, and thus makes the two pieces of literature dystopic. other aspect that connects the two pieces of literature unitedly is the subject of a totalitarian government ruling the people. In both works, the government creates the mind of a utopian world. The idea is that the government rules every aspect of the peoples proceeds, and that is the only way for a utopia to exist. This way of thinking is also reprobate in a sense, because totalitarian governments do not carefulness for the well being of its people. The people who rule only want power. That is why the reader realizes that the piece of literature is dystopic. In Fahrenheit 451, the totalitarian government controls th e police, mechanical hounds, and the firemen.The firemen act infra the wishes of the government to burn peoples books. An chronicle of the firemen is revealed in Beattys quote, there was no longer need of firemen for the old purposes. They were minded(p) the new job, as custodians of out sleep of mind, the focus of our understandable and rightful collar of being inferior official censors, judges, and executors.Thats you, Montag, and thats me (58, 59). Beatty is explaining the reason that governments created firemen to burn books. The government can censor information that the public receives with the creation of the firemen, and it is the job to the people and the firemen to do their duties without question. That bedecks the totalitarian government in the companionship of Fahrenheit 451.In 1984, the totalitarian government is led by a figure, whopping chum salmon. The Inner ships company and the Outer Party are also part of the totalitarian government, only consisting of 15% of the population of Oceania. These people in the Inner and Outer Parties, with the riddance to Winston, are devoted to sorry Brother. Big Brother is the figure that holds the party and utopian nightspot together, and the propaganda and demonstrations center around the totalitarian form of government. What is truly scary to the highest degree the totalitarian community is that when someone goes against protocol, like Winston did, he/she was not executed immediately. Instead, they are made to love the totalitarian nine and supply devotion towards it. Then they are annihilateed. This is illustrated in the quote, He looked up again at the portrait of Big Brotherthe final, indispensable, healing change had neer happened, until this minute of arcThe long-hoped-for bullet was entering his brain He loved Big Brother (297). Winston was tortured at the Ministry of Love in set out to love Big Brother. The government never slaughtered him, and finally at the end, Winston lov ed Big Brother and was finally in bliss. This shows the horrors of the government. The government has total control over the people, and no one can escape from committing a crime against the government. The government lead everlastingly and forever be. That is one of the reasons why the piece of literature is considered dystopic. It is also a reason why 1984 is a powerful book and serves as a warning to the readers. In conclusion, a similar aspect of both dystopic literatures is the totalitarian form of government in both. That type of government holds the Utopian familiarity together, and it is precisely that aspect that horrifies the reader and makes both pieces of literature dystopic.A final post that both Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 have in common is that the protagonist as well as the antagonist who know the accuracy about the type ofsociety they live in. Unlike the common people, the protagonist realizes that the world they live in is not perfect. The majority of people are c ontent with their society, hardly Winston, in 1984, and Montag, in Fahrenheit 451, realizes that there could be so much more in the world that they live in. Montag discovers the truth and acquaintance that the burned books contain. Montag shows curiosity for books by saying, There must be something in books, things we cant imagine, to make a charwoman run in a burning house there must be something there. You dont stay for nothing (51). Montag shows interest at books because he saw a woman voluntarily burn herself alongside her books.Thus he reasoned that books must contain substance. It also illustrates that Montag is a flaw to the perfect Utopian society. Even his wife shows little care for books or the fact that a woman was burned with her books. However, Montag starts to glimpse the imperfect society he lives in. Winston is also unhappy with how the government is and especially because of how there is little or no privacy. He is driven with the dreams and hopes of a better place, a better government in which to live in. He demonstrates this by writing in a diary, which was against the rules of the government.He also rebels in a sense by writing in the diary, dump WITH BIG BROTHER (20). Another connection that is piece of landd by Montag and Winston is that both their wives illustrated the perfect form of beings in the society. Winston as yet tell that he hated his wife because she really didnt have a mind of her own. This showed that there were only few people in the Utopian society that effected the society and government for what it was, and that the society was terrible.The antagonists also know the truth of the world they live in. In Fahrenheit 451, the antagonist is Beatty, who has read many books himself. He is very erudite and uses literature to confuse Montag. In the end, the reader gets a sense of Beatty wanting Montag to shoot him in order to be go off of the acts he is committing and the government he is in. Beatty provokes and pus hes Montag to kill him by saying, Go ahead now, you second-hand litterateur, pull the trigger (119). Although it doesnt state clearly in the book that Beatty wanted Montag to kill him, it is one way of viewing this matter. In a similar way, OBrien is the antagonist of 1984. During the part when he interrogated Winston, the reader learns that OBrien is reallywith Big Brother, and he has legitimate the fate and results of the current government a long term ago.He even admits that he wants power and control. OBrien proves both these facts by stating, They got me a long time ago (239), and, The party seek power entirely for its own sakeIt is exactly the opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined (263, 267) OBrien admits to siding with the current totalitarian government, but also admitting that the current society is flawed and grants power to a contract few, at the cost of the other 85% of the population. Thus, the two pieces of literature also share the fact that the protagonists and antagonists know the whole, or part, truth. It is these connections that found together these two books written about dystopic literature.And to conclude, Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 are both pieces of dystopic literature. some(prenominal) have many aspects in common. Although the two books are unrelated to each other in the sense of characters and the setting, both illustrate a dystopic world and give similar reasons and ideas about such a world. both(prenominal) books illustrate how censorship can be used to control the people under the influence of the government. The books also reveal the fate for a totalitarian government in order for the world to be a utopia and yet to the reader, dystopic.Finally, both pieces of literature show that there are flaws to this type of world to the protagonist as well as the antagonist in it. However, the way that the authors illustrate the outcome of the protagonist and antagonist is different. In George Orwell s cruel dystopic world, the protagonist loses all hope and loves Big Brother at the end. In Bradburys dystopic world, Montag retains the hope that with his knowledge of books, humans can one day dispel the cruelty and censorship of the totalitarian government.While Fahrenheit 451 and 1984 can be read and just taken as a fantasy, a book that illustrates what could have happened, but did not. However, the authors of these books did not intend them to be simply read and discarded. What the author wants to impart to the reader is a warning. The warning is that in the future, the world that humans live in might one day smoothen the world created by Bradbury or Orwell. If there is one thing for certain, it is a scourge that the current world will reflect a world in Fahrenheit 451 or1984. After all, humankind is evolving with swiftness, and anything can happen. There are many televisions in the world. Only one more shout to make them all interact with each other and transmit/receive im ages, and the telescreens in 1984 exist. Sound, which is a predominant part of the utopian world, is taking up peoples time and thoughts in the real world.With all of the MP3s and all of the other practice of medicine tools that people constantly listen to, life thus is starting to mirror the worlds of Orwell and Bradbury. Finally, people go at a quick and faster pace now. Eventually, there will be a point where people have to stop and think about what is truly happening around them and to think about nature. If this does not happen, then indeed the world will be repel into an unending cycle of chaos, and some may call it utopia when that happens. When a government arises to take power without the question or have of the people, then is it utopia, or chaos and thralldom?BibliographyBradbury, Ray. Fahrenheit 451. The Ballantine Publishing Group, 1953.Orwell George. 1984. New American Library, NY, 1949.